Skip to main content

Where do Holocaust euthanasia practices fit into the modern euthanasia discussion?

Sierra Weiss is a senior majoring in Interdisciplinary Studies with a focus on Disability Studies and Bioethics. She was awarded a Spring 2017 Independent Grant which she used to conduct research under Dr. Rosemarie Garland-Thompson on the T4 program during the Holocaust.

Following my approval to conduct SIRE research this semester, I excitedly shared the news with my family and friends. The questions and interest quickly pursued regarding my research; I very casually mentioned the T4 Program during the Holocaust and implications on modern forms of eugenics. I assumed that most of the people I was talking to, many of whom are Jewish, would know exactly what I was talking about, however, to my great surprise, they never heard of the T4 program. Before embarking on my research at the beginning of the semester, it became clear to me how important this research is and, as I delved further into my topic, how little it is discussed.



Approximately 200,000 people or more with disabilities were murdered during the Holocaust. While there are hundreds of Holocaust memorials for Jewish victims of the Holocaust, there are few memorials for the lives with disabilities that were wrongly taken. Berlin hosts the most well-known memorial to the victims of the Holocaust who were murdered due to their disabilities, which was only conceived and erected in the past decade. The Nazi Euthanasia Program was conducted under the watch of Philip Bouhler and Dr. Karl Brandt and named the T4 Program after the location of its origin, Tiergartenstrasse 4, Berlin. Noted historians on the Holocaust, such as Henry Friedlander, believe that the amount of devastation the Nazis were able to carry out originated in the results of the T4 Program. If the results of the Holocaust were a direct consequence of the T4 Program, why isn’t it discussed more?

What I have found in my research so far has been a subtle correlation between modern forms of eugenics, like abortion and assisted suicide, in European countries that were directly involved in the Holocaust. While this is likely a result of the genocide that took place during the Holocaust as a whole, stricter laws in central Europe, like Germany, Belgium, France, and others make abortions very difficult to approve. A comparison between the steps that led to the mass murder of the Jews and abortion laws has shown an eerie similarity that has mostly been ignored in discussions of abortion. Taking this argument one step further, I have found through my research that a disturbing amount of the language used to justify modern abortion, describes fetuses in ways similar to how people with disabilities are often systematically dehumanized in modern culture. Language like sub-human and unworthy of life or life not worth living are often present in the rhetoric that surrounds disability.


While modern forms of eugenics are grounded in autonomy and allowing people to do what they want with their own bodies and lives, selective eugenics based on disability are noticeably reminiscent of Nazi genocide. People with disabilities were targeted initially because they weren’t granted autonomy and were already separated from society by being placed in hospitals and asylums. While human rights have come a long way to protect people with disabilities against discrimination through the Americans with Disabilities Act and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, among others, people with disabilities are still systematically killed on the basis of disability. It is difficult to draw a line between modern eugenics based on autonomy versus to avoid disability. This prominent issue is one that I have been struggling with in the final stages of my research.

On Wednesday, I am traveling to Washington D.C. to visit the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. During my visit, I plan to research in the extensive archives available at the Museum and visit other museums in the area pertaining to disability history. I think that access to the documents available in the archives will allow me to understand the topics I have been researching over the past months in greater depth and will, potentially, help me clarify some of the complicated issues I have faced. I look forward to learning in a more hands-on environment and surrounded by experts as well as artifacts that will strengthen my knowledge of this topic.

As I prepare for my visit to D.C., I have been reflecting on the emotional toll of my research. While I have been able to mostly conduct my research from a very academic perspective, I predict that exposure to the artifacts, photos, and clips that I will see at the museums in D.C. will bring my research to life. As the granddaughter of a Holocaust survivor, the Holocaust and the atrocities that occurred have always been deeply troubling to me, but I have become desensitized to reading about the mass murders and plans for extermination. Entering the final stages of my research, I hope to regain an emotional attachment to this subject. My ancestors were persecuted for being Jewish and I have spent years studying their history and sharing their stories. It is time for the victims of the Holocaust who were murdered because of their disabilities to have their stories told as well. 

Visit the Undergraduate Research Programs website to learn more about applying for Independent Research Grants.

Comments

  1. I was married at 32 and immediately tried to get pregnant. When I was unable to conceive I had blood tests for fertility and was told that I had an FSH (follicle stimulating hormone) of 54 and would not be able to have children. Even though the doctors knew that I had been diagnosed with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis since age 25, no one bothered to check my thyroid levels. my TSH was measured at .001. My Synthroid dosage was lowered. a friend advise me to contact a spiritualist who help with fertility with his medicine, i collected his contact and explain my situation to him he prepared for me a herbal medicine which i took as describe by him. became pregnant very quickly, I had a successful pregnancy. I have my baby august 2017. to get pregnant at age 35 with my 2nd child in september 2019, thank you sir , this is his email contact if you require his help babaka.wolf@gmail.com or Facebook at priest.babaka

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Research Wednesday: Aamna's Story

Aamna Soniwala is a sophomore majoring in Human Health (on the pre-dental track) with a minor in Sociology. URP's Research Ambassador Arielle Segal had the pleasure of interviewing Aamna about her research experiences. Here it is:  What research do you do on campus? How long have you been doing it? “I work under Dr. K.M. Venkat Narayan with Dr. Jithin Varghese in the Hubert Department of Global Health at Rollins – specifically within the Emory Global Diabetes Research Center. I started during my second semester of my first year, researching global health equity in diabetes precision medicine.” How did you get started in your research? “I took HLTH 210 last spring, and Dr. Narayan was one of our asynchronous guest lecturers. I felt that I resonated with his values and research, so I reached out to him and started working with a post-doctoral fellow, Dr. Varghese.” How has research impacted your undergraduate career? “Research has allowed me to grow as a critical thinker and problem

A Whole New World of Research

Monica Vemulapalli is a junior majoring in Neuroscience and Behavioral Biology. She was awarded a Spring 2019 Conference Grant which she used to attend the Experimental Biology Conference . When I found out that my first ever research conference was going to be in my hometown of Orlando, Florida, I was excited! I knew that having an unfamiliar event happen at a very familiar place would make me less anxious. However, the conference turned out to be less stressful and more interesting than I ever thought. I attended  Experimental Biology (EB)  and   presented  my very first research poster , a memory that I will definitely cherish forever.

Why Research Wednesday: Katelyn King

  Katelyn King is a senior at Emory’s College of Arts and Sciences, majoring in Biology and minoring in Global Health, Culture & Society. Her research area is on c ancer biology, and she investigates the effects of knocking out anti-apoptotic genes on drug efficacy in multiple myeloma.   Her collegiate research journey started the summer after her first year. She was accepted into the NIH-NIDDK Short-Term Research Experience for Underrepresented Persons (STEP-UP) program and was tasked with finding a mentor. She reached out to Oxford Professor Dr. Taliaferro-Smith because SHE was interested in her triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) research. After a brief informational interview, Dr. Taliaferro-Smith invited Katelyn to join her lab! During the 10-week program, SHE studied the effects of genetic modifications in TNBC. She offered to continue her position on the project throughout the academic year as an Oxford Research Scholar. She has since had the opportunity to conduct rese